New York Times says agreement opens dialogue but not final peace
The New York Times has reported that while the interim agreement between the United States and Iran has been broadly welcomed internationally, governments remain cautious about its long-term prospects.
In an analysis by Jim Tankersley, the newspaper said many world leaders view the accord as an important step towards reducing tensions rather than a definitive resolution of the crisis.
According to the analysis, international reactions reflect a mixture of hope and concern.
While there is optimism that the agreement could help restore stability to energy markets and global trade, observers remain worried that fundamental disputes have been deferred to future negotiations.
The report said the agreement has succeeded in halting direct military escalation and creating an opportunity for dialogue, but has yet to resolve key issues, including Iran's nuclear programme and the future security balance in the Middle East.